Nutrient Loading Increases Red Snapper Production in the Gulf of Mexico

Joshua M. Courtney, Amy C. Courtney, Michael W. Courtney

Abstract


A large, annually recurring region of hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico has been attributed to water stratification and nutrient loading of nitrogen and phosphorus delivered by the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers. This nutrient loading increased nearly 300% since 1950, primarily due to increased use of agricultural fertilizers. Over this same time period, the red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) population in the Gulf of Mexico has shifted strongly from being dominated by the eastern Gulf of Mexico to being dominated by the northern and western Gulf of Mexico, with the bulk of the current population in the same regions with significant nutrient loading from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers and in or near areas with development of mid-summer hypoxic zones. The population decline of red snapper in the eastern Gulf is almost certainly attributable to overfishing, but the cause of the population increase in the northern and western Gulf is subject to broad debate, with the impact of artificial reefs (primarily oil platforms which have incr­eased greatly since the 1960s) being the most contentious point. Nutrient loading has been shown to positively impact secondary production of fish in many marine systems. The present paper offers the hypothesis that increased nutrient loading has contributed significantly to increased red snapper population in the northern and western Gulf of Mexico. Nutrient loading may be working in synergy with the abundant oil platforms both increasing primary production and providing structure encouraging red snapper to feed throughout the water column.

 


Keywords


Red snapper, Gulf of Mexico, hypoxia, nutrient loading, eutrophication, dead zones

References


Bianchi, T. S., DiMarco, S. F., Cowan, J. H., Hetland, R. D., Chapman, P., Day, J. W., & Allison, M. A. The science of hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: a review. Science of the Total Environment (2010) 408(7): 1471-1484.

Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Sen Gupta, B. K., Boesch, D. F., Chapman, P., Murrell, M. C. Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Does the science support the plan to reduce, mitigate, and control hypoxia?. Estuaries and Coasts (2007) 30(5):753-772.

Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Wiseman Jr, W. J. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, AKA "The Dead Zone". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (2002) 33:235-263.

Shipp, R. L., Bortone, S. A. A perspective of the importance of artificial habitat on the management of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. Reviews in Fisheries Science (2009) 17(1):41-47.

Gallaway, B. J., Szedlmayer, S. T., Gazey, W. J. A life history review for red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico with an evaluation of the importance of offshore petroleum platforms and other artificial reefs. Reviews in Fisheries Science (2009) 17(1): 48-67.

Cowan, J. H., Grimes, C. B., Patterson, W. F., et al. Red snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico: science-or faith-based? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (2011) 21(2):187-204.

Monk, M. Identification and incorporation of quantitative indicators of ecosystem function into single-species fishery stock assessment models and the associated biological reference points (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 2012).

Grimes, C. B. Fishery production and the Mississippi River discharge. Fisheries (2001) 26(8), 17-26.

Rabalais, N. N. Nitrogen in aquatic ecosystems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment (2002) 31(2), 102-112.

Nixon, S. W., Buckley, B. A. “A strikingly rich zone”—Nutrient enrichment and secondary production in coastal marine ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts (2002) 25(4):782-796.

Caddy, J. F. Marine catchment basin effects versus impacts of fisheries on semi-enclosed seas. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil (2000) 57(3): 628-640.

Thurow, F. Estimation of the total fish biomass in the Baltic Sea during the 20th century. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, (1997) 54(3): 444-461.

Caddy, J. F. Toward a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fishery ecosystems of enclosed and semi‐enclosed seas. Reviews in Fisheries Science (1993) 1(1):57-95.

Oczkowski, A., Nixon, S. Increasing nutrient concentrations and the rise and fall of a coastal fishery; a review of data from the Nile Delta, Egypt. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (2008) 77(3): 309-319.

Breitburg, D. Effects of hypoxia, and the balance between hypoxia and enrichment, on coastal fishes and fisheries. Estuaries and Coasts (2002) 25(4): 767-781.

Cowan Jr, J. H. Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico and US South Atlantic: Data, Doubt, and Debate. Fisheries (2011) 36(7):319-331.

Shipp, R. L. The artificial reef debate: Are we asking the wrong questions? Gulf of Mexico Science (1999)17: 51-55.

Szedlmayer, S. T. The artificial habitat as an accessory for improving estimates of juvenile reef fish abundance in fishery management. The use of artificial reefs in fishery management (2011) 31-44.

Syc, T. S., Szedlmayer, S. T. A comparison of size and age of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with the age of artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fishery Bulletin (2012) 110(4):, 458-469.

Redman, R. A., Szedlmayer, S. T. The effects of epibenthic communities on reef fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Management and Ecology (2009) 16(5): 360-367.

Topping, D. T., Szedlmayer, S. T. Home range and movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on artificial reefs. Fisheries Research (2011) 112(1): 77-84.

Gazey, W. J., Gallaway, B. J., Cole, J. G., Fournier, D. A. Age composition, growth, and density-dependent mortality in juvenile red snapper estimated from observer data from the Gulf of Mexico penaeid shrimp fishery. North American Journal of Fisheries Management (2008) 28(6): 1828-1842.

Lindberg, W. J., Frazer, T. K., Portier, K. M., Vose, F., Loftin, J., Murie, D. J., Hart, M. K. (2006). Density-dependent habitat selection and performance by a large mobile reef fish. Ecological Applications (2006) 16(2): 731-746.

Campbell, M. D., Rose, K., Boswell, K., & Cowan, J. Individual-based modeling of an artificial reef fish community: Effects of habitat quantity and degree of refuge. Ecological Modelling (2011) 222(23): 3895-3909.

Strelcheck, A. J., Cowan Jr, J. H., Patterson III, W. F. SEDAR31-RD28. In American Fisheries Society Symposium (2007) 60:135-148.

Daigle, S. T. What is the importance of oil and gas platforms in the community structure and diet of benthic and demersal communities in the Gulf of Mexico? (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 2011).

McCawley, J. R. Diet and prey demand of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, on Alabama artificial reefs. (Master’s thesis. University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. 2003)

de Leiva Moreno, J. I., Agostini, V. N., Caddy, J. F., Carocci, F. Is the pelagic-demersal ratio from fishery landings a useful proxy for nutrient availability? A preliminary data exploration for the semi-enclosed seas around Europe. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil (2000) 57(4): 1091-1102.

Chai, C., Yu, Z., Song, X., Cao, X. The status and characteristics of eutrophication in the Yangtze River (Changjiang) Estuary and the adjacent East China Sea, China. Hydrobiologia (2006) 563(1), 313-328.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.